Indonesian consumption growth, labor share, and saving rate

Recently, there have been many reports about the weakening of Indonesia’s middle class. The middle class in Indonesia has been shrinking since 2018 and now makes up only 17% of the total population. However, consumption growth often relies on the middle class. Unsurprisingly, Indonesia’s consumption growth has long lagged behind that of other countries in the region, except Thailand.

Indonesia’s consumption growth has been below the general pace of economic growth for quite some time. How is it possible for economic growth to outpace consumption growth?

One explanation is that this economic growth benefits those with a low consumption share. Consumption share refers to the portion of an individual’s income spent on consumption. Typically, this group consists of wealthy individuals or corporations. These entities already have high consumption levels. Any additional income is more likely to be allocated toward increasing assets (savings) or spending abroad. I previously discussed this issue in The Conversation Indonesia.

I will attempt to explore this theory by presenting two points: (1) Indonesia’s saving rate is increasing, and (2) the labor share is decreasing. I illustrate these two points using data from Total Economy - Integrated Institutional Sector Accounts (trillion rupiahs), 2016 - 2023 from BPS. This balance sheet is a very useful and interesting dataset as it includes calculations from all three methods of calculating Gross Domestic Product (GDP). I have made slight adjustments to the data, which can be viewed at the end of this post.

Increasing Saving Rate

The saving rate reflects the proportion of income saved by the population. A high saving rate indicates that people save more than they spend on consumption. As discussed above, the economic balance sheet does not differentiate the owners of the saving rate, but a significant increase in the saving rate typically signals a rising income share among groups more likely to save, such as wealthy individuals or corporations.

import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib as plt
import pandas as pd
data=pd.read_excel("neraca.xlsx",sheet_name="Sheet3")
dat=data[["tahun","LS","KS"]]
dat=dat.melt("tahun",var_name="jenis",value_name="nilai")
det=data[["tahun","srhh"]]
ax=sns.lineplot(data=det,x="tahun",y="srhh")
ax.set(xlabel="",ylabel="(%)",title="Saving rate (i.e., disposable income minus consumption),\nfrom Neraca Ekonomi BPS")
[Text(0.5, 0, ''),
 Text(0, 0.5, '(%)'),
 Text(0.5, 1.0, 'Saving rate (i.e., disposable income minus consumption),\nfrom Neraca Ekonomi BPS')]

png

Since 2016, Indonesia’s saving rate has continued to increase. COVID-19 forced everyone to reduce their savings, even increasing debt to maintain consumption. However, since then, the saving rate has risen again, even higher than usual. It seems that COVID-19 really dealt a blow to Indonesian consumers.

Declining Labor Share

Some analysts say that one of the problems is weak wage growth. Reed, Pasha, and Gonzales, in their report for the World Bank Group, wrote about weak wage growth and profits in manufacturing companies with high foreign ownership. The image excerpt below is from the report.

In the economic balance sheet, we can also calculate how much primary income is allocated for various purposes. I divide it into three: taxes, employee expenses, and profits. Profits consist of income that has already been reduced by taxes and employee expenses. I’ve plotted this below, but I excluded taxes as the amount is very small, around 5% of the total balance sheet1.

ax=sns.lineplot(data=dat,x="tahun",y="nilai",hue="jenis",palette="tab10")
ax.set(xlabel="",ylabel="(%)",title="Labor share (LS) and profit share (KS) of income, from Neraca Ekonomi BPS")
[Text(0.5, 0, ''),
 Text(0, 0.5, '(%)'),
 Text(0.5, 1.0, 'Labor share (LS) and profit share (KS) of income, from Neraca Ekonomi BPS')]

png

And it’s quite apparent that there has been progressive growth in the share of income absorbed by companies. As hypothesized above, an increase in the income share for companies is more likely to be saved, while an increase in the income share for employees is more likely to be consumed. So, at least based on this result, it makes sense.

Anyway, this post is actually just to share the chart. We can have a discussion outside of this post. Let me know what you think.

Below is the data I used. All of it was downloaded from Total Economy - Integrated Institutional Sector Accounts (trillion rupiahs), 2016 - 2023 with slight adjustments.

data

tahun L K T va/output LS TS KS srhh
0 2016 40.576885 55.127270 4.295845 52.877975 41.728750 4.435895 53.835356 30.864658
1 2017 41.472019 53.934836 4.593145 53.108782 42.704020 4.746633 52.549347 31.795110
2 2018 39.977940 55.237447 4.784614 52.986106 41.343331 4.965863 53.690807 32.159447
3 2019 39.252272 55.950651 4.797077 52.971298 40.403369 4.954449 54.642181 31.793236
4 2020 37.304707 58.410155 4.285138 53.170697 38.341668 4.418889 57.239443 30.021169
5 2021 37.283856 58.021987 4.694157 53.484228 38.272325 4.833429 56.894245 33.807914
6 2022 35.453018 59.557783 4.989199 53.799988 36.094115 5.095040 58.810845 38.504459
7 2023 34.970118 60.019108 5.010774 53.400921 36.068580 5.184493 58.746927 36.506632


  1. This 5% figure is quite interesting because Indonesia’s corporate income tax rate is much higher than that. This could make for an entire post on its own—maybe another time. ↩︎

Krisna Gupta
Krisna Gupta
Lecturer

Research mainly on international trade and investment policy and its impact on firms. Indonesia in particular is my main geographical focus. I also write at East Asia Forum and The Conversation Indonesia

comments powered by Disqus